This site has been set up by genuine CHELSEA fans to keep all true
supporters aware of what is happening regarding our home STAMFORD BRIDGE. It’s purpose is for an open discussion,
without any vested interest or propaganda as other
sites purvey. The future of our club and where we play, is
very important and we the fans have a very big part to play in that decision, particularly being the only club in the EPL whose fans own the club name and pitch. Vital questions now
need to be addressed by the club. Worrying developments have occurred over the
last 15 months and we as fans need to know exactly
what is happening.
Most CHELSEA fans are aware over 25 years ago
STAMFORD BRIDGE was almost lost to the club, through property speculators
wanting to bulldoze the stadium and build a housing estate on the present site.
The site at that time, once developed was valued at £40m, which would have created a massive potential return for the developers.
Ken Bates the then chairman, saved the day, saw off the speculators and set up
the Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO), where all supporters were encouraged to buy a share
for £100 to protect the club from ever falling into similar danger in the
future. Over the last 20 years, approximately 15000 people have bought shares
and they are still available to purchase at the same price today – which we would encourage all fans to do, to ensure that the
future of our club is upheld.
In October 2011, CPO share holders were informed
that Roman Abramovich wished to buy back all the shares at £100 each, Bruce Buck the
present chairman stated that all CPO shareholders had a "fair chance" to vote on
whether they wished to sell their shares or not. The club gave NO further
information to supporters why this was suddenly so important to them. The club
stated that owing to Financial Fair Play regulations being introduced shortly, the club had to be able to
compete against other top European sides in the future, citing that the small
capacity at Stamford Bridge as disadvantaging us in comparison to other leading clubs.
It was also stated by Bruce Buck that ALL
possible avenues had been explored by the club, in the possibility of expanding
Stamford Bridge. This was later found to be untrue when questioned openly in
front of 700 people in October 2011 during the CPO voting. He conceded that
Chelsea Football Club HAD NOT submitted any plans whatsoever in the previous 10
years in regards to the expansion of the ground. Hammersmith & Fulham
Council have since confirmed this.
Suspicion by the majority of CPO shareholders
was compounded, when it was suggested at the meeting, that £250k worth of
shares had been purchased by Bruce Buck and Roman Abramovich`s associates
purely to corrupt the vote. Buck refused to comment, but the National press
confirmed all the names and exposed the underhand tactics that the club had
adopted in their pursuit to seize all the shares from CPO shareholders.
Richard King the CPO chairman immediately
resigned, as it was obvious that he had not been working in the interests of
CPO, which was set up to be totally independent of the club. Steve Frankham
replaced him, but once again his actions so far have not been in the interests
of the CPO shareholders and he continually refuses to `ring fence` the £250k
illegally purchased shares, as they continue to affect all voting patterns, which
is unfair on all original CPO shareholders.
The present valuation of the combined land at Stamford Bridge
is £900m. If developed by the club, the return could be as high as £1.6b. If
the club were to relocate, this would cost approximately £500m if a site were
to be found, which would create a massive financial return of £1.1b. Some CPO shareholders cite
this as the possible motive. We must state that we have an open mind on this,
but the clubs next move, will prove where the truth
lies.
We are at a critical time in the future of our
club, most fans want Stamford Bridge redeveloped if possible, if and when it is
proved NOT to be possible, then everyone will accept that a move is inevitable.
But to where? No available sites big enough within a 3 mile radius of Stamford
Bridge exist. Unless the club are looking even further afield. We as fans
demand answers from our club, the fans are the only constant, the present owner
and board are only passing through. Questions need to be answered:
A: Why were £250k of shares purchased by the
clubs associates to corrupt the vote of CPO shares in October 2011?
B :Why are the £250k of shares illegally
purchased still included in any future voting?
C: Why have fans been told that Stamford Bridge
can not be redeveloped, when the local council say that it is possible and why
do the club refuse to meet with the council to confirm if redevelopment is
possible or not?
D: CFC recently announced the 5th biggest
financial turnover in World football. Next year TV income will increase by 70% reducing yet further the significance of stadium income, so why do the club still feel that it is imperative to move from
Stamford Bridge?
E: Battersea and Earls Court are now not viable sites for relocation,
so do the club now feel that even further away from the present site is now
acceptable?
F: If the existing combined site at Stamford Bridge
is estimated to be worth £900m, why has the pitch and club's name only
been valued at £20k?
This is an outline view of where we are at the
present time. All Chelsea fans and CPO shareholders understand, that the club
need to be able to compete in the future, without relying on Roman Abramovich`s
money. No one wishes to hold the club back, but we as fans have then right to
know, what the true motives are.
No comments:
Post a Comment